Cases 1 - 5 of 5
North Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Phillip E. Berger et al
as 5:2018mc00009
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Defendant:
Phillip E. Berger, Timothy K. Moore, The State of North Carolina and others
Movant:
Dallas Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
North Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Phillip E. Berger et al
as 5:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Defendant:
Phillip E. Berger, Timothy K. Moore, The State of North Carolina and others
Movant:
Dallas Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
v. North Carolina Democratic Party et al
as 5:2018cv00175
Defendant:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
NC Democratic Party v. Phillip Berger
as 18-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DURHAM COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BIPARTISAN STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS ENFORCEMENT and KIMBERLY STRACH, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al v. BERGER et al
as 1:2017cv01113
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY , CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY , DURHAM COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Defendant:
PHILLIP E. BERGER , TIMOTHY K. MOORE , THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
