Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The City of Ormond Beach, Florida v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv02167
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Walmart Warehouse #45, MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Ormond Beach, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Board of Commissioners of Fulton County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45440
Defendant:
SPECGX LLC, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Commissioners of Fulton County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hanlon et al v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2019op45206
Defendant:
Watson Laboratories,Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hanlon and Amy Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 3:2018cv02445
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas County Children Services Board of Trustees, Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio and Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Lucas County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00605
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jackson County, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00571
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HOUSTON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
