Cases 11 - 20 of 104
MICHAEL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al

as 2:2014cv07429
Petitioner:
BRIAN HENDERSON MICHAEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT , MARK VOGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAJCOOMAR v. AVILES
as 2:2014cv07339
Petitioner:
GILDHARY RAJCOOMAR
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mendez v. Aviles et al

as 2:2013cv06101
Petitioner:
CARLOS MENDEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, Scott A. Weber, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUDDOCK v. AVILES et al

as 2:2013cv03444
Petitioner:
CLIVE RUDDOCK
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, JANET NAPOLITANO and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOPEZ v. AVILES et al

as 2:2013cv03106
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JIANG v. AVILES
as 2:2013cv02520
Petitioner:
JING NING JIANG
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOWEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2013cv01862
Petitioner:
RUPERT BOWEN
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEADLEY v. AVILES
as 2:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
KAREN HEADLEY
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ONOH v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv05502
Petitioner:
ONYEKWU ONOH
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMALL v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv04768
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY SMALL
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, WAYNE MULLER, RUBEN PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.