Cases 61 - 70 of 146
ABDULLAH v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04668
Plaintiff:
SHARIFF M. ABDULLAH
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLIER v. WELL PATH MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
LEVAR COLLIER
Defendant:
WELL PATH MEDICAL SERVICES, OSCAR AVILLES, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALVAREZ v. AVILES
as 2:2022cv04580
Plaintiff:
DIEGO ALVAREZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2022cv04500
Plaintiff:
MR. TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, OSCAR AVILLES, WELL PATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENNEY v. WELL PATH (MEDICAL SERVICES) et al
as 2:2022cv04452
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MCKENNEY
Defendant:
WELL PATH (MEDICAL SERVICES), THOMAS A. DEGISE and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2022cv04340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DIR. OSCAR AVILES, LT. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04187
Plaintiff:
DORIAN GAINES
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. GREEN
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
MUHAMIN BEY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
JASHAWN YOUNGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
