Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
OFFMAK ASSOCIATES v. OTA FRANCHISE CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: OFFMAK ASSOCIATES
Defendant: OTA Franchise Corporation doing business as Online Trading Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Investopedia, LLC v. OTA Franchise Corporation d/b/a Online Trading Academy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07268
Plaintiff: Investopedia, LLC
Defendant: OTA Franchise Corporation doing business as Online Trading Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Amy Jine, et al v. OTA Franchise Corporation, et al
as 20-56281
Defendant / Appellee: EYAL SHAHAR, individually and as an officer of OTA Franchise Corporation, Newport Exchange Holdings, Inc., and NEH Services, Inc., OTA FRANCHISE CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation, SAMUEL R. SEIDEN, individually and as an officer of OTA Franchise Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANA BIOCINI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and AMY JINE
Ehab Khalil v. OTA Franchise Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv01152
Defendant: NEH Services, Inc., Eyal Shahar, Samuel R. Seiden and others
Plaintiff: Ehab Khalil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OTA Franchise Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv01151
Petitioner: Samuel R. Seiden, Newport Exchange Holdings, Inc., NEH Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Fernando Avila et al v. OTA Franchise Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv00960
Defendant: NEH Services, Inc., Samuel R. Seiden, Eyal Shahar and others
Plaintiff: Fernando Avila and Larry Gellman
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0025
Amy Jine et al v. OTA Franchise Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv00769
Defendant: NEH Services, Inc., Eyal Shahar, OTA Franchise Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Ana Biocini and Amy Jine
Consolidated Plaintiff: Fernando Avila and Larry Gellman
Intervenor Plaintiff: Ehab Khalil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
FTC v. OTA Franchise Corporation, et al
as 20-55356
Defendant / Appellant: NEWPORT EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation, EYAL SHACHAR, individually and as an officer of OTA Franchise Corporation, Newport Exchange Holdings, Inc., and NEH Services, Inc., AKA Eyal Shahar, NEH SERVICES, INC., a California corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: 1,398 STUDENT AMICI
v. OTA Franchise Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv00284
Defendant: Eyal Shachar, NEH Services, Inc., Samuel R. Seiden and others
Federal Trade Commission v. OTA Franchise Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv00287
Defendant: Eyal Shachar, NEH Services, Inc., Samuel R. Seiden and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?