Cases 1 - 7 of 7
WHITLEY et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WHITLEY and BRENDA WHITLEY
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION , AVCO CORPORATION, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Starnes, et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation, et al
as 3:2012cv00755
Plaintiff:
Ralph Oneil Starnes and Betty Starnes
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Cast Iron Pipe Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starnes, et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Ralph Oneil Starnes and Betty Starnes
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Cast Iron Pipe Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Harris et al v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Billy David Harris and Robin L. Harris
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler, Inc., American Standard, Inc., Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Beal v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kim Victor Beal
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Aurora Pump Company, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Beal v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Darrell Victor Beal
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAGE et al v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. PAGE and PAULA PAGE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
