Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Healthy Gulf, et al v. DOI, et al
as 24-1024
Petitioner:
Healthy Gulf, Friends of the Earth, Bayou City Waterkeeper and others
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Price et al v. Chippewa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Diane Veen Price, Sherri Rockwell, Daniel Clement and others
Defendant:
Chippewa, County of, Carmen M. Fazzari, Marjorie Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theison et al v. Dickinson, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Mary Drogemuller, John Linguidi, Edward Theison and others
Defendant:
Dickinson, County of, Lorna Carey, Antrim, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor:
BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
Jackson v. Haile Gold Mine, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03838
Plaintiff:
Deiaokiki Jackson
Defendant:
Haile Gold Mine, Inc. doing business as Oceana Gold Haile Goldmine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
American Petroleum v. Healthy Gulf
as 22-30353
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Petroleum Institute, American Exploration & Production Council, Independent Petroleum Association of America and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Healthy Gulf, Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
