Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Guy v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 1:2023cv03889
Plaintiff:
Frederick Guy
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, AW Brenda Hick-man, Work Official Kenneth Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cleveland v. Cartledge et al
as 4:2015cv04512
Plaintiff:
George Cleveland, III
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, I Mayes, M Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. South Carolina Dept of Correction of General Counsel et al
as 8:2015cv02772
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Correction Office of General Counsel, Joseph McFadden and Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Byars et al
as 6:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Henry W Martin, Jr
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Dr Moer, T Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Beckett et al
as 8:2011cv02886
Plaintiff:
Edward Billy Bennett
Defendant:
Dallas Beckett, Bernard Mackie, SCDC Director NUK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv01333
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lamar Roberson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint and Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Anderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2008cv01108
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Office of General Counsel David M Tatarsky SCDC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2008cv01108
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Office of General Counsel David M Tatarsky SCDC , John Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
