Cases 1 - 10 of 106
James Phillips v. Officer Clark, et al
as 25-1625
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
OFFICER CLARK, OFFICER CRANE, OFFICER SMITH and others
Johnson v. Smith et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mardarrius Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Reed, Officer Clark, Lt. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Judge Petty et al
as 1:2025cv00028
Petitioner:
Bradley Wheeler
Respondent:
Judge Petty, Governor Little, Warden Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Begeot v. Clark et al
as 9:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Bryan Begeot
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Corrections Officer Clark and Sergeant Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Clark et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Defendant:
Officer Matz and Officer Clark
Plaintiff:
Micaal Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv02987
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK
Plaintiff:
DAE'ZHION SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Mr. Brown, Kyle Rosch, Officer Clark and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMon v. Foster et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Defendant:
Unit Manager Foster, CERT Officer Clark, Lt. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Frank DeMon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Hall v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Terique Hall
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Veronica Stewart, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
