Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shockey v. Cox et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ira Shockey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Cox, Correctional Officer Walters, Correctional Officer Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CATALANO v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2018cv11646
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL P., PARKING OFFICER OLIVER, TRENTON POLICE OFFICER DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CATALANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irby v. Skagit County et al
as 2:2018cv01035
Defendant:
Jane, Jane and or John Doe, Skagit County and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Jon Irby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10340
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06604
Defendant:
City of Rochester, ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, police officer rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
taylor v. Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06605
Defendant:
City of Rochester, ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, police officer rizzo and others
Plaintiff:
phillip taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Silmon et al v. City of Buffalo, New York et al
as 1:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Silmon , Mary Silmon , Jeffery E. Campbell, II and others
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, New York , City of Buffalo Police Department , Gregory Kwiatkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LYNCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv02247
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNCH and DAVID BLACK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID SMITH, CHRISTOPHER BARTHELEMY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ACEVEDO et al v. OFFICER DOE(S)
as 2:2007cv01423
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO ACEVEDO, JR., JESSICA LEBRON and BENNY MARTINEZ
Defendant:
OFFICER DOE(S) and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
