Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Luis Mancilla Arroyo v. Espinoza et al

as 2:2024cv10353
Plaintiff:
Luis Mancilla Arroyo
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. City of Gilroy et al

as 5:2024cv03206
Defendant:
Officer Romero, Officer Espinoza, Officer Bobadilla and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luis Mancilla Arroyo v. U.S.P. Lompoc et al
as 2:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Luis Mancilla Arroyo
Defendant:
U.S.P. Lompoc and Correctional Officer Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridi v. The State of California et al
as 5:2021cv03668
Plaintiff:
Tao Ridi
Defendant:
The State of California, Officer Espinoza, The City of San Jose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Beavers v. Hosey et al

as 1:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Warden, Officer Mendoza, Officer Hosey and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Erskin v. Officer Hernandez, et al
as 19-20137
Defendant / Appellee:
ED GONZALEZ, DETENTION OFFICER ESPINOZA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY KIM OGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ERSKIN
Erskin v. Hernandez et al

as 4:2018cv03561
Defendant:
Commissioner Rodney Ellis, Harris County Judge Ed Emmett, Ed Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Erskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv05235
Plaintiff:
Ricky Edward Cruz
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections and Correction Officer Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Brown v. Los Angeles, County of et al

as 2:2013cv00161
Defendant:
Charles Antuna, Mr. Leroy Baca, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brown
Movant:
Lumkin
Clarence Allen v. Charlie Beck et al

as 2:2012cv09892
Plaintiff:
Clarence Allen
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.