Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GRAY v. DILLARD et al
as 7:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
PETE DILLARD, Officer BRITTANY JOHNSON, Officer JERIAH RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy-Gehler et al v. City of Florence et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Officer Newton, Officer Cottingham, John and Jane Doe Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Nicklaus Gehler and Mary Malloy-Gehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond Roker v. Moore, et al
as 19-5091
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT A. BARNETT, in his/her individual and official capacity, HEARING OFFICER NEWTON, in his/her individual and official capacity, ROBERT L. MOORE, Chief Jailer, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMOND JULIAN ROKER
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03111
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Johnson, Sgt. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. County of Gallatin et al
as 2:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nathan Fremont Green
Defendant:
County of Gallatin, Officer Newton, Any Individual Responsible for Supervising or Training Office Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. County of Gallatin et al
as 6:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nathan Fremont Green
Defendant:
County of Gallatin, Officer Newton, Any Individual Responsible for Supervising or Training Office Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addahoumi v. Pastides et al
as 3:2016cv01571
Plaintiff:
Sammi H Addahoumi
Defendant:
Harris Pastides, Dennis Pruitt, Bobby Gist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
