Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Allen Atkins v. Russell Savoie, et al
as 23-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ATKINS, aka Allen Aikens
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER RUSSELL SAVOIE, sued in his individual capacity, WARDEN CONNIE HORTON, Warden, sued in her individual capacity, ACTING WARDEN JAMES CORRIGAN, sued in his individual capacity and others
Mitchell v. Skinner et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Defendant:
Officer Pitt, Vernon Byrd, R. Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cleveland Dunn v. Ware SP Warden, et al
as 16-16603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVELAND D. DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARE SP WARDEN, ADAMS, Ware State Prison, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, Ware State Prison and others
Esaa Wright v. S. Peterson, et al
as 15-10569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESAA S. WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
S. PETERSON, Officer Ware State Prison, in his individual capacity, TAYLOR, Ware State Prison, in his individual capacity, PAYNE, Ware State Prison, in his individual capacity and others
Cleveland Dunn v. Adams, et al
as 14-14590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVELAND D. DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Ware State Prison, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, Ware State Prison, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
:
SERVICE
North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Barret, Mrs. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Officer Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Ware et al
as 2:2009cv02353
Plaintiff:
Lynwood Bernard Thompson
Defendant:
Officer Ware, Officer Jenkins and B Zachary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
