Cases 1 - 10 of 253
VOYAGER DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 3:2023mc80052
Debtor In Possession:
VOYAGER DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Samuel Bankman-Fried and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
In re: Archbishop of Agana, et al v. Continental Insurance Company, et al
as 22-16720
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a Corporation Sole, Most Rev. Michael Jude Byrnes, Coadjutor Archbishop of Agana
Appellant:
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, successor by merger to Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey
Appellee:
ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a Corporation Sole,, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, TORT CLAIMANT CREDITORS A.A. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al
as 2:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Wade Beasley, Christopher R. Humphries, J&J Consulting Services, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Beasley Law Group PC and Jeffrey J. Judd
Not Classified By Court:
Petitioning Creditors, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Vyonne S. Mendenhall and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Housing Solutions, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Danny Ayala, as court appointed receiver for Beasley Law Group LPC, Geoff Winkler and Credit Union 1
Cross Claimant:
Jason A. Jenne
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Omid Shahabe and Kristie Young
In Re:
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Aaron Grigsby and Grigsby Law Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: PG&E Corporation, et al v. Public Employees Retirement, et al
as 21-16507
Debtor:
In the Matter of: PG&E CORPORATION
Appellee:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, PG&E CORPORATION, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Appellant:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO, YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Amicus Curiae:
JUDITH K. FITZGERALD, Honorable, Retired and INGRID M. HILLINGER, Professor
In re: Dana Hollister v. USBCLA, et al
as 21-70673
Not Classified By Court:
BOBS, LLC, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner:
DANA HOLLISTER
USA, et al v. X-Treme Bullets, Inc., et alIn re: USA, et al v. X-Treme Bullets, Inc., et al
as 21-15003
Appellee:
HOWELL MACHINE, INC., LEWIS-CLARK AMMUNITION COMPONENTS, LLC, HOWELL MUNITIONS & TECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR X-TREME BULLETS, INC.
Debtor:
HOWELL MUNITIONS & TECHNOLOGY, INC., LEWIS-CLARK AMMUNITION COMPONENTS, LLC, COMPONENTS EXCHANGE, LLC and In the Matter of: X-TREME BULLETS, INC., AMMO LOAD WORLDWIDE, INC., CLEARWATER BULLET, INC., FREEDOM MUNITIONS, LLC, HOWELL MACHINE, INC.
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of the Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00682
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Theresa McDonald, et al v. PG&E Corporation, et al
as 20-17366
Trustee:
OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE
Appellee:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION
Not Classified By Court:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS and OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Appellant:
THERESA ANN MCDONALD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv07967
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv07865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
