Cases 1 - 10 of 244
(HC) Wren v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2025cv00205
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Collins v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2025cv00206
Petitioner:
Dentrell Collins
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wren v. On Habeas Corpus
as 2:2025cv00589
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rollarson v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv01536
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Cleveland Rollarson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rollarson v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01527
Petitioner:
Cleveland Rollarson
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. Collins, et al.
as 24-7411
Defendant:
VINCENT ARTHUR FABIANO SISNEROS, Inmate #326517, LACEE COLLINS and ANTONY BLINKEN, Bailment Case No. 20173205-001 Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff:
CHRIS MAGIS NERO, Principal Bailee and Federal Bounty Hunter of the Republic of Arizona
(HC) Medina v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Robert Medina, Jr.
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Dodd, et al.
as 24-7040
Defendant:
Attorney ANDREW LOVE, CA, HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER, Attorney PATRICIA DANIELS, California Appellate Project (CAP) and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL GAY
Gay v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Defendant:
Attorney Andrew Love, Attorney Lynne S. Coffin, Attorney Patricia Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Thomas v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
