Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rogers Shipp v. Financial Freedom
as 16-1855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGERS SHIPP
Defendant - Appellee:
FINANCIAL FREEDOM, a division of One West Bank, N.A.
Tomerlin et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
David Tomerlin and Shannon Tomerlin
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , One West Bank, N.A. and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tomerlin et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02717
Plaintiff:
David Tomerlin and Shannon Tomerlin
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , One West Bank, N.A. , Equifax Information Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv11229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sherry Krstovski, et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust, et al
as 13-2736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRY KRSTOVSKI and KRIS KRSTOVSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As Trustee of the Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2005-A4, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2005-D and ONE WEST BANK, FSB
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Krstovski et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 2:2013cv11722
Plaintiff:
Sherry Krstovski and Kris Krstovski
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and One West Bank, FSB
Cloos et al v. One West Bank et al
as 2:2012cv14956
Plaintiff:
Michael Cloos and Cheryl Cloos
Defendant:
One West Bank and Federal National Mortgage Association
Rae Bullard, et al v. IndyMac Bank FSB, et al
as 12-2350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAE ANDERSON BULLARD and ROCKWOOD W. BULLARD, III
Defendant - Appellee:
INDYMAC BANK FSB, a federal banking corporation, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., jointly and severally, INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, a California banking corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
