Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
St. Clair County v. Evernorth Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Express Scripts Holding Company, Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
St. Clair County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Lake County, Illinois v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv02402
Plaintiff:
Lake County, Illinois
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Steffen et al v. Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Steffen, Lisa Steffen, AARP Medicare Advantage/UHC Claims Admin. Optum and others
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Management Corp., Holcomb Gorby LLC, ABC Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MD Spine Solutions, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03435
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company of the River Valley, United Healthcare Services, Inc., Optum, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MD Spine Solutions, LLC and MD Spine Solutions, LLC doing business as MD Labs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Optum, Inc. v. Optim Dental LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01308
Defendant:
Optim Dental-1, LLC, Optim Dental Peoria-1 LLC, Srinivas Durshanapalli and others
Plaintiff:
Optum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
