Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Citrus HMA, LLC, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Citrus HMA, LLC, doing business as Seven Rivers Regional Medical Center, Naples HMA, LLC, doing business as Physicians Regional Medical Center, Northwest Hospital, LLC, doing business as Northwest Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Kingman Hospital, Inc. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2021op45100
Plaintiff:
Kingman Hospital, Inc., Arizona Spine and Joint Hospital LLC, Bullhead City Hospital Corporation and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,, Cephalon, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CITRUS HMA, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv00707
Plaintiff:
ORO VALLEY HOSPITAL, LLC, NAPLES HMA, LLC., PORT CHARLOTTE HMA, LLC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kingman Hospital Incorporated et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 3:2019cv08240
Defendant:
Watson Laboratories Incorporated, Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital, VHS Acquisition Subsidiary Number 1 Incorporated, Northwest Hospital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02110
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, LEXINGTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL , WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER , HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
