Cases 1 - 8 of 8
George P. Johnson Hong Kong Ltd. v. L.E.K. Consulting LLC
as 1:2020cv11269
Plaintiff:
George P. Johnson Company Hong Kong Ltd.
Defendant:
L.E.K. Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Huang et al
as 1:2019cv12484
Defendant:
Jodie D Banks, James Huang, Henry L Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
George P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00788
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marilyn P Johnson and Marilyn P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quiles-Maldonado v. Correctional Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 3:2015cv01165
Plaintiff:
Nanyeli N. Quiles-Maldonado
Defendant:
Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, Dra Sylvia P. Johnson, Forensic Psychiatric Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heath v. George P. Johnson Company
as 1:2012cv11136
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Heath
Defendant:
George P. Johnson Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Johnson et al v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2012cv11026
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Sweet , Ricard L. Torres , Ricard L. Torres, II and others
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Co., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zametkin v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 1:2008cv10960
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Investments, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Zametkin and Alan Zametkin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fallert v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 1:2004cv11812
Plaintiff:
David O. Fallert and Gilliam Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Company, Incorporated, FMR Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Haugen Plaintiffs and Bennett Plaintiffs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
