Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Williams v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
Danielle P. Williams
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Mills v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Shaka Senghor, J. Manangan, R. Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Parks, Ralph Diaz, P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirley Lindsay v. Ball and East, LTD. et al
as 2:2018cv05439
Defendant:
Ball and East, Ltd, Does, Harvey Capital Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Lindsay
Schull et al v. Maryland Casualty Company et al
as 6:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Billie J. Schull , Shannon Nagle , William B. Fiebelkorn and others
Defendant:
Maryland Casualty Company and Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilbo v. County of Alameda, California et al
as 3:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Pamela Saucer Bilbo
Defendant:
County of Alameda, California, City of Oakland, California and John P. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Holly J Harrison, Independence Homeowners' Association, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Barrett v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Jimmy Coker, M. Davidson, Julie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dexter P. Williams v. Warren L. ontgomery
as 2:2016cv03334
Respondent:
Warren L Montgomery
Petitioner:
Dexter P Williams
Michael P. Williams et al v. Cervello et al
as 5:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Jerry Amason and Michael P. Williams
Defendant:
C.S.G.T. Cervello and Robert Presley Detention Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
