Cases 1 - 10 of 51
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Frankie M. Miller, Jr. and Frankie Miller-El
Defendant:
Jeff L. Everhart, Michael P. Mullen, Margaret W. Deglau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROUD et al v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv01289
Defendant:
JAMES A. MOTZNIK, ROBERT P. RAVENSTAHL, JR., PRESIDENT JUDGE KIM BERKELEY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
POSTINDUSTRIAL and MATT STROUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. TUBE CITY RENAISSANCE et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
WAYNE LITTLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN and TUBE CITY RENAISSANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mullen v. John J Pershing VA Medical Center
as 1:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael P Mullen
Defendant:
John J Pershing VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
COGER v. PATRICK et al
as 2:2017cv01413
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK COGER
Defendant:
ROBERT PATRICK, JR., WILLIAM P. MULLEN, KARA N. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. MULLEN
as 2:2017cv01366
Petitioner:
BRIAN JONES
Respondent:
SHERIFF WILLIAM P. MULLEN , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOVE v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
MENDO ROMAN LOVE
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN and GREG RENKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
