Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McGowan v. Klein et al
as 1:2018cv01518
Petitioner:
Michael McGowan
Respondent:
P. Klein and Christopher Synsvoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stine v. Klein et al
as 1:2018cv00939
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
P. Klein, Humpheries, J. Osland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce v. Cermak et al
as 1:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
A. Cermak, D. Berkebile, S. Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER ANDERSON and others
Marshall v. Osagie et al
as 1:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Marshall
Defendant:
Anthony Osagie, R. Camacho, C. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hipps, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BACOTE, JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON and MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HIPPS and ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, P. KLEIN, S. KUTA and others
Pinson v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER KILMER and others
Stine v. Kuta et al
as 1:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
S.M. Kuta, P. Klein, Giaconi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hipps et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Charles Hipps, Antoine Bruce, Michael Bacote and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, P. Klein, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plumman v. Cozza-Rhodes, et al
as 1:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cyril S. Plumman
Defendant:
T.K. Cozza-Rhodes, P. Klein, M. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
