Cases
JONES v. EMPLOYEES OF THE PA. DEPT. OF CORR. INSTITUTION AT S.C.I. PHOENIX et al
as 2:2022cv02385
Plaintiff: SHAMEL JONES
Defendant: EMPLOYEES OF THE PA. DEPT. OF CORR. INSTITUTION AT S.C.I. PHOENIX, K. SORBER and INMATE ACCOUNTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upshaw v. PA Dept of Corr. at SCI Benner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02077
Defendant: PA Dept of Corr. at SCI Benner, C/O John Doe #1 and C/O John Doe #2
Plaintiff: Lafayette Upshaw Upshaw and Lafayette Upshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PA. DEPT. OF CORR'S. ET AL AT SCI FOREST, MEDICAL DEPT.
as 1:2018cv00046
Plaintiff: KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant: PA. DEPT. OF CORR'S. ET AL AT SCI FOREST, MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. PA Dept. of Corr. et al
as 4:2015cv01063
Plaintiff: Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant: PA Dept. of Corr., John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATRICK v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff: JAMES PATRICK
Defendant: ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JACK DANERI, ERNEST J. DISANTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. PA DEPT. OF CORRS. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01599
Plaintiff: FRANK RIVERA
Defendant: PA DEPT. OF CORRS., JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Carpenter, et al v. Supt Klopotoski, et al
as 10-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILIP CARPENTER
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee: IRENE, EDWARD G. RENDELL, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Defendant - Appellee: PRISON HEALTH CARE IND, Health Care for all Pa. Dept. of Corr. facilities, STANLEY BOHINSKI, contracted head doctor for SCI Dallasmedical facilities, CHERYL WISNIEWSKI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?