Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nails v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Elliot Nails
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Department of Correction, Connection, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlosser v. Kwak et al
as 3:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Milton Walsh, William Krahe, Hunchu and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Bansley / Anthony / Burdo LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01869
Defendant:
Corrections, Michael E. Boardman, Bansley / Anthony / Burdo LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv01594
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Depts. and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 3:2019cv00594
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla and Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and Gov. of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterkin v. Pardon and Paroles
as 3:2019cv00497
Petitioner:
Doram Anthony Peterkin
Respondent:
Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Padilla v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Municipality of Dallas and Texas Prison Parole System or Prison System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Milner v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2018cv01119
Defendant:
John Doe, Jason Bedard, Carelton Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanseverino v. Giles et al
as 3:2017cv02118
Plaintiff:
Pasquale Sanseverino
Defendant:
Carleton Giles, Scott Semple and Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
