Cases 1 - 10 of 386
(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2025cv01533
Plaintiff:
Dwight Melvon Coleman
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Mule Creek State Prison, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2025cv00651
Plaintiff:
Dwight Melvon Coleman
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Mule Creek State Prison, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Covello
as 3:2025cv01048
Petitioner:
Eduardo Jose Torres
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Collier v. Covello et al
as 2:2025cv00874
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lavial Collier
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Rogers, Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Stewart v. Covello
as 2:2025cv00819
Petitioner:
Charles Ranando Stewart, Jr
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. San Diego Superior Court
as 25-1421
Petitioner:
JERRY WAYNE YOUNG
Respondent:
SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT
Real Party In Interest:
PATRICK COVELLO
Nelson v. Covello
as 25-1377
Petitioner:
JAMES DENERICK NELSON, JR.
Respondent:
PATRICK COVELLO, Warden
Van Huisen v. Covello, et al.
as 25-1024
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
PATRICK COVELLO and MACOMBER
(PC) Wells v. Macomber et al
as 2:2025cv00521
Plaintiff:
Frank Orlando Wells
Defendant:
Jeffery Macomber and Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Attorney General of the State of California, et al.
as 25-241
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFICE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff:
Arcion and GEORGE EUGENE CROSS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
