Cases 21 - 30 of 278
Cesar Cabrera v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv01584
Petitioner:
Cesar Cabrera
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Starr v. Covello et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Ciara Sky Starr
Respondent:
Patrick Covello and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Shotwell v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
Immanuel Shotwell
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kawamoto v. Covello et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Darren Kawamoto
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Bannion, M. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Richard Sandoval
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Motley v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Edward Motley
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Correctional Supervising Cook, Correctional Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
