Cases 31 - 40 of 278
(PC) Kendrick v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02978
Plaintiff:
John F Kendrick and John F. Kendrick
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, K. Rodgers and T. Norgaard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dela Calzada v. Patrick Covello
as 3:2023cv06465
Petitioner:
Jovencio Dela Calzada
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Nemeth v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02572
Plaintiff:
James Nemeth
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Townsend and Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Sierra v. Patterson et al
as 2:2023cv02548
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
T. Patterson, A. E. Spearman and Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02394
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez and Javier Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, A. Bustamante, R. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archuleta v. Covello
as 3:2023cv05222
Petitioner:
David Clair Archuleta
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Snow v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Snow
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Jennifer P. Shaffer, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chambers v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chambers
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, L. Batson, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Mack v. Covello
as 2:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Darin Allen Mack
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merced v. Covello
as 3:2023cv04763
Petitioner:
Juan Autilano Merced, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
