Cases 41 - 50 of 278
(PC) Lorenz v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorenz
Defendant:
Davis, Patrick Covello, M. Ullery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Patterson et al
as 9:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
T. Patterson, M.E. Spearman, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khaliqi v. Covello
as 4:2023cv04359
Petitioner:
Mohammad Khaliqi
Respondent:
Acting Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Eastman v. State of CA et al
as 2:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Defendant:
State of California, Amador County, City of Ione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nelson v. Covello
as 2:2023cv01438
Petitioner:
James Denerick Nelson, Jr and James Denerick Nelson, Jr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaime Rivera v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-16001
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAIME RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, THE PEOPLE and PATRICK COVELLO, Warden
(PC) Cyrus v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Victor Renard Cyrus
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Quiring, A. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barefield v. Allison, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Barefield, Sr.
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Patrick Covello, K. Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lake v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Darius De'mon Lake
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Jeremy Rowe, Landreth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Cooper v. Patrick Covello
as 23-15856
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
