Cases 41 - 50 of 167
Dela Calzada v. Covello
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Jovencio Dela Calzada
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McCavitt v. Covello
as 2:2022cv01926
Petitioner:
Joshuah Brandon McCavitt
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Covello et al
as 2:2022at01250
Petitioner:
Brian Winfield Arnold
Respondent:
Patrick Covello, Rob Bonta and Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adam Cornejo v. Patrick Covello
as 22-16756
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM CORNEJO
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
Ruiz v. Covello et al
as 3:2022cv05777
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ramirez Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Cooper v. Covello
as 2:2022cv01632
Petitioner:
Justin M. Cooper
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Ponce v. Covello
as 1:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Tommy Ponce, Sr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Glass v. Covello
as 2:2022cv01383
Petitioner:
Daniel Avery Glass, Jr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nellum v. Covello
as 4:2022cv04735
Plaintiff:
Dashaun Nellum
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry William Stevens v. Patrick Covello
as 5:2022cv01216
Petitioner:
Jerry William Stevens
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
