Cases 51 - 60 of 167
Glass v. Covello
as 3:2022cv04462
Petitioner:
Daniel Avery Glass, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gabriel Espinoza v. Patrick Covello
as 8:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
Gabriel F Espinoza
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Austin v. Covello
as 2:2022cv01033
Petitioner:
Exzaver Dennis Austin
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Covello
as 2:2022cv04705
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams Stevens
Defendant:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Turner v. Patrick Covello
as 22-15767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
Jerry William Stevens v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2022cv04706
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams Stevens
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Petitioner:
Jerry William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaGrone v. Covello
as 4:2022cv03249
Petitioner:
Mark S. LaGrone, Jr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Goodwin Bentley, II v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2022cv03567
Petitioner:
Melvin Goodwin Bentley, II
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lopez v. Covello
as 2:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Alexander Lopez
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Matthews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2022cv04318
Petitioner:
Patrick Matthews
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
