Cases 91 - 100 of 125
FERGUSON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03304
Plaintiff:
RASHAUN FERGUSON
Defendant:
PATRICK NOGAN, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON, (JOHN DOE) GRANADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRABOWSKI v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv03349
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD GRABOWSKI
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSE JR. v. S.C.O. et al
as 2:2016cv03100
Plaintiff:
TROY R. ROSE JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O., PATRICK NOGAN, GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSAINVIL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2016cv02016
Plaintiff:
WEDPENS DORSAINVIL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION , PATRICK NOGAN , CINDY FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON , PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAINER v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv01576
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
STEVEN TRAINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEELE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv08216
Petitioner:
YUSEF STEELE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GORDON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2015cv08157
Petitioner:
ALQUAN GORDON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANTANA v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2015cv08248
Petitioner:
WILFREDO SANTANA
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCARGO v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2015cv07163
Petitioner:
VICTOR MCCARGO
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
