Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Pilger v. Mosley et al
as 2:2018cv00854
Defendant:
Donald M. Mosley and Ariel Stern
Plaintiff:
Paul William Pilger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cumby et al v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv30049
Plaintiff:
Herman P Cumby and G. Cumby
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, City of Springfield, Daniel Billingsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown et al v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown , Michael Russell , Ernest Lewis and others
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2017cv02275
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SHIH-CHANG MA
Defendant:
DAVID PAUL WILLIAMS and RICHARD NIGEL CHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ann Melton, et al v. D.C. Government
as 17-7070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ann Melton, Gregory Dukta, Richard Paul Williams and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Government of the District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WILLIAMS v. BANGOR DAILY NEWS et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BANGOR DAILY NEWS , BANGOR PUBLISHING COMPANY , ABIGAIL CURTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Canipe v. Gaston County Board of Education et al
as 3:2016cv00717
Defendant:
Gaston County Board of Education , W. Jeffrey Booker , Mark Hollar and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Canipe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Walker et al (TV2)
as 3:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
Darlene M. Walker, Thomas Barclay , Blake Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
