Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GAW et al v. THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00261
Defendant:
STEVEN CONANT, CORIZON, INC., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DORIS GAW and TREVOR MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JACKSON et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00815
Plaintiff:
ALISHA ANDERSON and DAMION JACKSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER EDWIN G. BUSS, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICER, MIKE RAINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN v. THE BUSINESS OFFICE OF PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2010cv01555
Plaintiff:
GALEN HARLAN FREEMAN
Defendant:
THE BUSINESS OFFICE OF PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TURNER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON TURNER and CLAYTON TURNER
Defendant:
OFFICER __________ LAMAR and STATE OF INDIANA/INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
