Cases 41 - 50 of 109
MICHAEL v. WEXFORD HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02746
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KREISER and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY S. MICHAEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAYLOR v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2020cv02140
Defendant:
SHEILA TEMPLE, HARRISON COUNTY and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA v. IDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01929
Defendant:
A. DEWAR, IDOC, C. BYNUM and others
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2020cv00667
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ZATECKY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYSON v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2020cv00562
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
LEON TYSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDARIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv00062
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEDARIS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAYLOR v. GAYDEN et al
as 1:2020cv00048
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and GAYDEN
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARY v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv04600
Plaintiff:
LOREN DAVID GARY
Defendant:
A. WRIGHT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and A. WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARVEY v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN et al
as 1:2019cv04154
Plaintiff:
JAMES GARVEY
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ASSITANT WARDEN, CURTIS and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUGGLE v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv04055
Defendant:
AARON SMITH, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINE COOK and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN PHILLIP JOSEPH TUGGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
