Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMPSON et al v. MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2020cv00485
Defendant:
PENNY BAILEY, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ALLEN THOMPSON
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAQUETTE v. CPC RULE PROGRAM ADMIN et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
PENNY BAILEY, TIM APP, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ADMIN and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FONTES PAQUETTE, SR
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M GROSS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, GLEAN BROWN, SUSAN CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOFF v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 2:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R SCHOFF, JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, SCOTT LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ericson v. Magnusson, et al
as 13-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, Individually and in his official capacity, CORIZON, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH PONTE, official capacity only, PATRICIA BARNHART, official capacity only, SCOTT BURNHEIMER, official capacity only and others
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SWARTZ et al
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
DONALD WHITE, I
Defendant:
BARBARA SWARTZ, HANNA MONACO, GORDON WERTHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
