Cases 1 - 10 of 455
W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. v. Follett Higher Education Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Follett Higher Education Group, LLC, George Kyroudis and Ryan Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Paige Elizabeth Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer, Robert Murray and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
LAURIE PETERSON
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Lawrence v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Jenkins v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Peterson v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Peterson
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
Peterson v. Valnet Inc.
as 1:2023cv11246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
Valnet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
