Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff: Bernard T Gordon, Sr
Defendant: Pfizer Inc, Green Bay Correctional Institution and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dome et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff: Monroe Lavard Davis
Defendant: Michael Dome, Patrick S. Muldowney, University of Texas Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. Pfizer Inc.
as 22-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Cassaday
Defendant / Appellee: Pfizer Inc.
Cassaday v. Pfizer Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02495
Plaintiff: Kevin Cassaday
Defendant: Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01221
Plaintiff: Bernard T Gordon
Defendant: Pfizer Inc and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chergi v. Exxonmobil Corp et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Defendant: Pfizer Inc and Exxonmobil Corp
Plaintiff: Paul Chergi, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Pregnancy Resource Center et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant: Pfizer Inc and Pregnancy Resource Center
Plaintiff: Vincent W Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv00450
Defendant: John/Jane Doe(s), John/Jane Does 1-10 and Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tyrrone R. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Robinson et al
as 5:2016cv00454
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Merck & Company, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dayrin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Doe et al
as 9:2007cv00001
Plaintiff: Andre King
Defendant: Jane Doe and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?