Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FULTON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
SHARONELL FULTON , CECELIA PAUL , TONI LYNN SIMMS-BUSCH and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
Movant:
SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES and PHILADELPHIA FAMILY PRIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01548
Plaintiff:
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
Movant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PENNSYLVANIA CHAMBER OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02084
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TATE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VURIMINDI v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv01891
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R VURIMINDI
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, DARRELL CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-4355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
NOLAN v. SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SCDC) et al
as 2:2008cv00661
Plaintiff:
ANN M. NOLAN
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SCDC), DONNA M. HENRY, PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS (PCHR) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
