Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15902
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellee: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15598
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba America, Inc., et al
as 17-15597
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Marta Cooperative of America, v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16982
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16427
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16400
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?