Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hardaway v. Pineiro
as 1:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
Kevin E. Hardaway
Respondent:
Aaron Pineiro and Coastal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardaway v. Pineiro
as 4:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Kevin E. Hardaway
Respondent:
Aaron Pineiro and Coastal State Prison
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bussey v. Pineiro
as 3:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fox v. Pineiro
as 1:2023cv05327
Petitioner:
Michael D. Fox
Respondent:
Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bentley v. Pineiro
as 4:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Tony Bentley and Tony L. Bentley
Defendant:
Warden Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardaway v. Pineiro et al
as 4:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Hardaway
Defendant:
Warden A. Pineiro, Deputy Warden P. Glenn, Lt. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Pineiro et al
as 4:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tyrone B. Green
Defendant:
Warden Aaron Pineiro, D/W B. Kaigler, Dr. O. Awe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browner v. Pineiro et al
as 4:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tommy Browner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Aaron Pineiro, Captain Ricky Brown, Sgt. Steffon Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. PINEIRO
as 1:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
CEDRIC PRICE
Respondent:
AARON PINEIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
