Cases
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor: Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner: People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant: Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Natural Resources Agency, et al. v. Ross, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00426
Plaintiff: State of California by and through California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, California Environmental Protection Agency and California Natural Resources Agency
Intervenor: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, State Water Contractors, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor Defendant: Sacramento River Intervenors, Oji Brothers Farm, Inc., Sutter Mutual Water Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation distri, et al
as 09-17723
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Plaintiff: METROPLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff in Related Case
Defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Defendant - Appellant: ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES, LP, RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1004 and others
Defendant-intervenor: SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUAL WATER COMPANY, PELGER MUTUAL WATER COMPANY and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-17661
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Plaintiff: METROPLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff in Related Case
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-17599
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Defendant: ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEVERLY F. ANDREOTTI, BANTA-CARBONA IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Defendant-intervenor: SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?