Cases 1 - 10 of 34
TUFFY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUFFY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TENAGLIA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
DAVID TENAGLIA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPREY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
ALEX DUPREY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06540
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROSSI
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06539
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWEN
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOSTIC et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC BOSTIC , SHERRON HILL , DERRICK QUADENFIELD and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOBE et al v. SOTO et al
as 2:2015cv06014
Plaintiff:
IVONNE BOBE and LAURA MONTALVO
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. SOTO, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES et al v. SKILETZ et al
as 5:2015cv03906
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOLMES , JR. and DAVID SANTEE
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRANK SKILETZ, IV , JOSHUA DAVID BRUBAKER , KEVIN BIROSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLEY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DOOLEY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
