Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Priestley v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016fp00387
Defendant:
FNU Balluck, Stephen A. Church, Dave Consentino and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Priestley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hanson v. Rockingham County Department, et al
as 13-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN CHURCH, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, LIEUTENANT HORNE, Lieutenant, GEORGE HASELTINE and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT CONSENTINO, JOHN BLOMEKE, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, LIEUTENANT TRAINOR and others
Hanson v. Haseltine, et al
as 12-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HANSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN CHURCH, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, JOHN BLOMEKE, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, FNU HORNE, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HASELTINE, a/k/a FNU Hazelton
Hanson v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2011fp00534
Defendant:
John Blomeke, FNU Consentino, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. US Marshals Service et al
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Prealou J. Roberts
Defendant:
US Marshals Service, Wentworth Douglas Hospital, Prime Care Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez v. Strafford County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007fp00021
Plaintiff:
Jesus M. Lopez
Defendant:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Prime Care Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
