Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Angelo v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00779
Plaintiff:
Evan Angelo
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle, Inc. and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torbit, et al v. Walmart Stores, Inc., et al
as 7:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Kyle Torbit and Sandra Torbit
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. , Walmart Stores East, LP and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuck v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Dakota Schuck
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Pacific Cycle, Inc. , Cycling Sports Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soper v. Pacific Cycle Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Soper
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle Inc. and Dorel Industries Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pineda v. Pacific Cycle
as 5:2013cv01081
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle, Inc.
512) 476-4400 (fax:
Estela Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
E.N. et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv03486
Plaintiff:
E.N. and Daniel Neal
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABREU v. PACIFIC CYCLE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05520
Plaintiff:
JULIE ABREU
Defendant:
PACIFIC CYCLE, INC. , TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA , JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Evans v. Walmart Stores East LP et al
as 5:2013cv00892
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Evans
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East LP , East Coast Assemblers and Pacific Cycle Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Gonzales v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04767
Defendant:
Does, Dorel Asia Inc., Dorel Industries Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Duffy v. Pacific Cycle Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02932
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle Inc. and Dorel Industries Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark P Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
