Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PETERSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09184
Plaintiff:
PAMELA PETERSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERCE-BEMIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv06389
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF PAMELA PETERSON and JUANITA PIERCE-BEMIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez et al v. Middleton Community Health Center, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02211
Defendant:
Middleton Community Health Center, Inc., Pamela Peterson, Christopher Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Elideth Bautista Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2014cv30125
Plaintiff:
Pamela Peterson and David Peterson
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2014cv06388
Plaintiff:
PAMELA PETERSON and DAVID PETERSON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv03466
Plaintiff:
Darren Peterson and Pamela Peterson
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17745
Plaintiff:
Pamela Peterson and Terry Peterson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
