Cases 1 - 10 of 1,054
Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc. v. Pruyt, et al.
as 25-2432
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC.
Defendant:
GARRIT PRUYT, Carson City District Attorney, AARON DARNELL FORD, Nevada Attorney General, STEPHEN B. RYE, Lyon County District Attorney and others
HOOVER, SR. v. EVANS et al
as 2:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO LEE HOOVER, SR.
Defendant:
TYLER EVANS, CHIEF MATTHEW THARP, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MT PLEASANT TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARTINEZ v. HARRY et al
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
ALBERT E MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, ERIC TICE, C PASQUALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
YANNI et al v. FORD
as 2:2025cv00823
Plaintiff:
JACLYN YANNI and PASQUALE YANNI, SR.
Defendant:
ANDREW J. FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
