Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLAYBERGER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv15506
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA CHANDLER CLAYBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ryan v. Benton County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv01176
Plaintiff:
Ray Edward Ryan, Jr.
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Patricia Chandler and Shelia Brake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv26317
Plaintiff:
Patricia Chandler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClure v. Benton County Jail et al
as 1:2013cv01234
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith McClure
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Patricia Chandler, Advanced Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Penn Credit Corporation
as 2:2013cv00668
Plaintiff:
Patricia Chandler
Defendant:
Penn Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chandler et al v. Res-Care, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Felton Chandler and Patricia Chandler
Defendant:
Res-Care, Inc. and Res-Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Boggs et al v. Benton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2007cv01122
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Boggs, Michael Ryan Boggs, Sherry Boggs and others
Defendant:
Benton County, Tennessee, Cecil Wells, Jr., Lola Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
