Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
McBee v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv03215
Plaintiff:
Richard McBee
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuals, Charles (I) Samuals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Custard v. Allred, et al
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Shepard v. Rangel, et al
as 15-1424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE SHEPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA RANGEL, ADX, General Population Unit Manager, individually and in her official capacity, DARREN FOSTER, ADX Counselor, individually and in his official capacity, DANIEL SHEPHERD, ADX, Correctional Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Bruce v. Denney, et al
as 15-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DENNEY, Regional Psychology Services Administrator, MORRIS LEWIS, Regional Psychology Treatment Program Coordinator, PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director and others
In re: Custard
as 15-1003
Petitioner:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Respondent:
DAVID ALLRED, YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Mood v. Laird et al
as 1:2014cv02827
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Mood
Defendant:
Paul Laird and Patricia Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. Rangel, et al
as 14-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA RANGEL, D. BERKEBILE, BOB CUSTARD and others
Mallett v. Vargas et al
as 1:2014cv02198
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
K. Vargas, Payne, David B. Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. Rangel et al
as 1:2014cv02086
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
Patricia Rangel, D. Berkebile, Bob Custard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
