Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20040
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Terri Hopkins, Tonia Hopkins, Chris Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04569
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00032
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Collier et al
as 6:2020cv00653
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Assist Ward Vernon Mitchell, TDCJ Exec Director Bryan Collier, TDCJ-CID Sr Warden Jimmy Bowman and others
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick Smith v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-40696
Petitioner / Appellant:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00493
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick Smith v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-40802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK BERNARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director, ROGER D. PAWELEK, ROBERT G. BEARD and others
Smith v. Livingston et al
as 3:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Roger D Pawelek, Robert G. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Smith v. Sean Murray, et al
as 13-51134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK BERNARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEAN MURRAY, HOWARD K. BENNETT, Physician Assistant Certified, MARK MINSHEW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
