Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samuel Patrick Burns v. Brandon Price
as 2:2021cv06823
Petitioner:
Samuel Patrick Burns
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Palace Coffee Company et al
as 2:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
Palace Coffee Company, Patrick Burns and Krystal Burns
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
Stephens et al v. Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Co et al
as 5:2021cv01854
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McCue, Kelton Stephens, Shelton McCue and others
Defendant:
Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Co, Big Ford Consulting Inc, Landstar System Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00746
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina v. Buther
as 19-3348
Defendant:
Michelle Belgard, M.D., Gregg Esposito, Captain at Eastern Correctional Facility, Kevin Signore, Captain at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Anthony Medina
Defendant / Appellant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision
HICKS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03082
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HAHN, AMORRIS CONLEY, JONATHAN STARK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hicks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02092
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hahn, Amorris Conley, Jonathan Stark and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
